Impious Ethics (Still) Impossible

anarchy symbol In To Be As God: A Study of Modern Thought Since The Marquis de Sade (Ross House, 2003) Rousas John Rushdoony reiterates how the consistent immorality of the Marquis de Sade is the course most logically consistent with unbelief.

Because [the Marquis de] Sade was so consistently evil, he was more logical than most evil men and most churchmen, whose inconsistent profession of Christianity blurs their vision badly. Sade’s fundamental premise in “Yet Another Effort, Frenchmen,…” was simply this: having abandoned Christianity, men should therefore logically abandon all law; “for what should we, who have no religion, do with law?” Law being the will of the sovereign, to abandon God as sovereign means to abandon His law. And, if man is now sovereign, how can there be any law over man? Is not man’s will the only law? (13)

If this post is a review, it may also appear, less nicely formatted and typically abridged, on such other sites as Amazon and GoodReads. If this post has odd gaps in it, this probably means some ads have failed to display. If you miss the ads, try reloading the page. Otherwise, just enjoy their unexpected absence.

 Like this site? Help pay my expenses: Buy me stuff!   Do I mention a book or other product you’d like to buy? Check prices on   Protected by Copyscape Plagiarism Checker: Do not copy content from this page. 

All Pious Eye™: Seeing by the True Light™ content © 2005– by David M. Hodges, unless otherwise noted. Unauthorized reproduction prohibited. Sharing encouraged. Syndication enabled. Syndicated content must be unaltered, fully credited, & linked back to original.

If you’d like to discuss this post or related issues, please leave a comment below (if comments are enabled) or contact me.

About Pious Eye (David M. Hodges)

I am the person who is Pious Eye: David M. Hodges. Thank you for reading!
This entry was posted in Annotated Quotations and tagged , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

So, what say you?